Angels & Demons | Spill.com Movie Reviews
More Movie Reviews: www.Spill.com Angels & DemonsMovie Review from Spill.com – Watch our movie review for the film Angels & Demons and if you enjoy the review, Subscribe. Also visit our site to see the trailer for the movie Angels and Demons and watch more movie reviews from Spill.com, make sure to watch Spill’s animated Angels and Demons movie review. If It’s Crap… We’ll Tell You! Talk Movies my.spill.com & Demons Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com
25 Responses to “Angels & Demons | Spill.com Movie Reviews”
By ChristianScholarship on Dec 19, 2009 | Reply
I noticed a very interesting part of this movie that raised an eyebrow. The fact Dan Brown wrote that the Vatican pushed the Illuminati underground. The fact is that it was the Bavarian Government. However, G. Washington established with his letter that they moved to the USA in at least 1798 or earlier. Timothy Dwight IV, President of Yale University also confirms this. When truth is stretched as far as this movie does it, I can no longer consider it anymore than stupidity.
By RiokaSon on Dec 19, 2009 | Reply
Omg at the end I was PISSED. So much twists- great movie! Totally recommend it! SPOILER: (don’t look if you don’t wanna..)
Omg I they should’ve gotten that stupid chamberlengo or w/e and put him through justice b4 he commited suicide. :X
By dgsierra10 on Dec 19, 2009 | Reply
I was expecting this movie to be a lot better then what it was, its a low rental, I was expecting a full price kind of film, and it was not that great Da vinci code was much better.
I am into the illuminati and secret societies stories but this is not the greatest movie, nor did I really feel the book Angels and demons because it does not tell the full story of the Vatican church.
By TheDrunkenCelt on Dec 19, 2009 | Reply
*Heads Explodes* I get what what you mean but Ugh, I’ll just continue to steer clear of physics
By Morcridx1 on Dec 19, 2009 | Reply
radargab it’s a movie, they just took theroy and applied it. nothing wrong with it.
By Morcridx1 on Dec 19, 2009 | Reply
you have to read up on Anti-matter, but u are right anti-matter can’t exist in existance of matter……which is our existance. Anti-Matter only exist in theroy.
so in aother words Anti-matter has to exist but it doesn’t, or at lest not in our existance. (ex. Dark can’t exist without light; action / reaction; matter / anti-matter)
By Morcridx1 on Dec 19, 2009 | Reply
those elements can’t exist without the 4
By Morcridx1 on Dec 19, 2009 | Reply
“forget that bomb im trying to defuse these panities off this chick!” LOL funny as hell
By Morcridx1 on Dec 19, 2009 | Reply
Anti Matter only exist in theroy
By redsword22 on Dec 19, 2009 | Reply
the book is just genius .. I didn’t watch the movie as I didn’t DaVinci code the movie ..
this type of stories is all about details and such an empty minded guys like those REVIEWERS would set and talk about a theme like that judging the hotness level of the girl in the movie, this is what make me sick of your stupid reviews
By HolyknightVader999 on Dec 19, 2009 | Reply
Damn…..AMEN BRO!!!!
By hollywoodsaint57 on Dec 19, 2009 | Reply
i laughed so hard i cried on the comparison between the pope and the darkside emperor, the “fast food military” gaurding a hamburger, and making time……i’m sold…i subscribed
By larosco on Dec 19, 2009 | Reply
yeah i fell asleep
By robotpanda77 on Dec 19, 2009 | Reply
This is more of a action drama then the mystery drama of the first film, and the story is a bit less serious, but still, it is not a bad ride.
By Windex223 on Dec 19, 2009 | Reply
anti matter isn’t science fiction its real
By Kniletiah on Dec 19, 2009 | Reply
Wait… was that whole ‘anti-matter’ thing made of æther? Æther is, after all, known as the ‘fifth element’ back when Fire, Earth, Air and Water were the four basic ones, originally. Of course we’ve since became smart enough to think of Life and Necromancy as elements too, I guess…
So is it æther…?
~|K|~
By eirino0369 on Dec 19, 2009 | Reply
I so the film, but first I read the book…hey didnt they miss the konig the king…max kohler.. -how ever you spell it—the director of the cern?
I really like that character in the book. U.U
By Loudkorean on Dec 19, 2009 | Reply
I want Tom Hanks to star in other films…not just connected to this series…Maybe Cast Away 2?……Hell no,maybe some other shyt lol
By vicrockz89 on Dec 19, 2009 | Reply
Although I disagree with you………that anology made me LULZ.
By jammes122 on Dec 19, 2009 | Reply
It was better than the Da Vinci Code film, but the book was much better.
By vanzahn on Dec 20, 2009 | Reply
Ohhh don’t get me started on it.
Dan brown’s writing makes Stephen King’s look like fucking shakespeare! I’m seriously thinking of taking Dan Brown to court for stealing two hours of my life!
It’s better than The Da Vinci code but only in the same way that it’s better to wipe your ass with sand paper than barbed wire.
By vanzahn on Dec 20, 2009 | Reply
Awful film.
By Delta0prative on Dec 20, 2009 | Reply
Books are always better. I thought “The Da Vinci Code” was a great book, but the movie was so dry and boring.
By capcomfan2010 on Dec 20, 2009 | Reply
yeah your right he does look like eperor palpitine uh did i spell that right
By electronicflyguy on Dec 20, 2009 | Reply
Loved the book movie sucked